Evidence-Based Practice

 Evidence-based practice

“Evidence Based Library and Information Practice (EBLIP) seeks to improve library and information services and practice by bringing together the best available evidence and insights derived from working experience, moderated by user needs and preferences. EBLIP involves asking answerable questions, finding, critically appraising and then utilizing research evidence from relevant disciplines in daily practice. It thus attempts to integrate user-reported, practitioner-observed and research-derived evidence as an explicit basis for decision-making.” (in Booth, 2006)

Relevant ASLA Standards
3.2 Commitment (commit to the principles of education and librarianship)
3.2.1 • Are dedicated to excellence in professional service.
3.2.2 • Emphasise a learning and teaching focus in school library programs and services.
3.2.3 • Promote the profession of teacher librarianship in their schools and the wider community.
3.2.5 • Participate in continuing professional development.
Leadership and Advocacy
3.3 Leadership (demonstrate leadership within school and professional communities)
3.3.2 • Promote and nurture a ‘whole school focus’ on information literacy policy and implementation.
3.3.3 • Build and foster collaborative teams within school and professional communities.
3.3.4 • Provide effective and transformational leadership to school library and information services staff.

School libraries are encouraged to engage in evidence-based practice. Conference papers describing examples of evidence-based practice are available from Transforming the Profession: Evidence-Based Libraries and Information Practice (http://www.eblip4.unc.edu/papers.html ).

Evidence of student outcomes resulting from library curriculum programs can be collected by teacher-librarians and used to inform future practice (2.4.1 & 2.4.2). The Evidence Based Library and Information Practice (EBLIP) Toolkit (EBLIP Toolkit) and the School Library Impact Measure Toolkit (SLIM Toolkit ) are two approaches currently used. Education Queensland’s Productive Pedagogies Reflection Manual is another useful framework for reflective practice. Teacher librarians can also use free web-based applications such as Survey Monkey to gather information from student, staff and parent/carer members of their school community. Information gathered through evidence-based practice, professional reflection and client surveys should inform the library’s curriculum practice and collection development.

In Semester 2, 2011, I undertook a small-scale information learning activity project with a preparatory year class. I used a modified version of the SLIM Toolkit questionnaire that included a drawing activity, polls and interviews, to gather data about the children’s learning. The children's drawings and interview data were analysed to assess the growth in children's knowledge of the topic and their understandings related to information seeking practices. 

People Who Help Us 
View the unit of work

Results of pre-unit brainstorming sessions.

The main findings of this project related to the value of staff collaboration and research; the nature of learning in the early years; and the importance of developing the skills of planning and reflecting.

Curriculum planning and implementation are greatly enhanced by teacher collaboration, developing common understandings about learning approaches, and adopting a specific inquiry-based learning approach. Engaging teachers in action research about classroom practice can help them to develop shared understandings and improve professional practice.

In early childhood, the emphasis should be on learning to learn and developing communication, social and thinking skills necessary to cooperative learning. A focus on learning to learn is compatible with inquiry-based learning and the aims of information literacy (Kapitzke, 2003; Kinder 2004). Young children are naturally curious, making questions an ideal starting point for learning. Engaging children in question-driven, experiential learning and meaningful play, such as scenario specific dramatic play and problem solving challenges, will enhance learning (Lonka et al, 2007, p. 19).

Planning and reflecting are the keys to research readiness (Heider, 2009, p. 517). Teachers should involve children in identifying their own information needs, formulating their own questions and find their own solutions. However, children also need to develop the metacognitive and language skills to express their learning. Opportunities to reflect on describe and discuss their learning are essential to developing metacognition. Drama and philosophy for children provide ideal opportunities for young children to engage in reflection and critical thinking activities about real life scenarios. Through these activities, children explore their world, plan courses of action and develop metacognitive skills. Use of ICTs needs to be infused in everyday practice so that their usefulness to inquiry and information seeking is transparent. Teachers have a responsibility to provide leadership in higher order thinking, to model meta-language, by engaging children in meaningfully learning through substantive conversation (Grieshaber, 2010). 

 Examples of children's work.

Implications for future practice

Reflective professional practice is also essential (2.4.4). In future, I will use pre- and post-assessment to determine the effectiveness of library programs. The findings of this project reaffirmed my belief that I need to promote inquiry-based learning within the school and involve teachers in collaborative. The implementation of Curriculum to Classroom units of work will make it easier to anticipate curriculum needs of each year level. However, collaboration with the head of curriculum and teachers is essential to ensure that students are engaged in effective inquiry-based learning and that library activities complement and enhance learning. 

USEFUL LINKS

Evidence Based Library and Information Practice http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP

Evidence Based Library and Information Practice (EBLIP) Toolkit http://eblip.net.au/

Productive Pedagogies http://education.qld.gov.au/public_media/reports/curriculum-framework/productive-pedagogies/html/about.html

Survey Monkey http://www.surveymonkey.com/MySurveys.aspx

Tranforming the Profession: Evidence-Based Libraries and Information Practice http://www.eblip4.unc.edu/papers.html

REFERENCES

Booth, A. (2006). Counting what counts: performance measurement and evidence-based practice. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 7(2), 63-74.

Cotter, L. & Spencer, A. (2007). Evidence-Based Librarianship — a measured approach to library success [conference presentation]. Library Connect: Bangkok, Thailand. 1 August 2007 &  Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 2 August 2007. Retrieved November 13, 2011 from www.elsevier.com/framework.../2007LisaCotterPresentation.pdf

Wilson, V. & Hall, S. (2008). “Welcome to the Evidence Based Toolkit for Public Libraries!” on ebltoolkit. Retrieved November 13, 2011 from
http://ebltoolkit.pbworks.com/w/page/9671460/FrontPage

Australian School Library Association, Australian Library and Information Association. (2001). Learning for the future: developing information services in schools. Carlton, Victoria: Curriculum Corporation.

Dole, W., Huyrych, J. and Koehler, W. (2000). 'Values for librarians in the information age'. Library Management, 21 (6), 285-297.

Grieshaber, S. (2010). Beyond discovery: a case study of teacher interaction, young children and computer tasks, Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(1), 69–85. Retrieved September 26, 2011, from Taylor and Francis http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057640903567047

Heider, K. L. (2009). Information Literacy: The Missing Link in Early Childhood Education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36(6), 513–518. Retrieved August 6, 2011, from EBSCOhost.

Kapitzke, C. (2003). Information Literacy: A Review and Poststructural Critique. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 26(1), 53–66. Retrieved September 4, 2011, from QUT ePrints http://eprints.qut.edu.au/8867/

Kinder, D. (2004). Information Literacy: A Key to Success in the 21st Century. The Greet Exchange, Spring, 2004. 3–4. <?Ryerson University. Retrieved September 3, 2011, from http://www.ryerson.ca/lt/publications/GREETSpr04V03Apr5.pdf

Kuhltau, C. C., Maniotes, L. K. & Caspari, A. K. (2007). Guiding Inquiry: Learning in the 21st Century. Westport: Libraries Unlimited.

Lerkkanen, M.K. (2007). The Beginning Phases of Reading Literacy Instruction in Finland. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä. Retrieved August 29, 2011, from cass.org/downloads/41/41_14_The%20Beginning%20Phases%20of%20Reading%20Literacy.pdf

Lonka, K., Hakkarainen, K. and Sintonen, M. (2000). Progressive Inquiry Learning for Children — Experiences, Possibilities, Limitations. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 8(1), 7–23. Retrieved September 4, 2011, from Taylor and Francis Online.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13502930085208461

Todd, R., Kuhlthau, C. & Heinström, J. (2008). School Library Impact Measure (SLIM): A Toolkit and Handbook for Tracking and Assessing Student Learning Outcomes of Guided Inquiry through the School Library [draft]. Center for International Scholarship in School Libraries, Rutgers University. Retrieved October 21, 2011, from http://cissl.rutgers.edu/guided_inquiry/slim.html

Todd, R., Kuhlthau, C. & Heinstrom, J. (2005). SLIM Toolkit Questionnaire. Center for International Scholarship in School Libraries, Rutgers University. Retrieved October 21, 2011, from http://cissl.rutgers.edu/guided_inquiry/slim.html